“ A logical counter explanation, to your point, would be that geographic locations sponsoring the opening of a Starbucks may also be making a general investment in local businesses, and as a result we see startup density in general increase.”
Yes, and you also need to explore whether rejected Starbucks openings are really random and whether those neighborhoods are in fact good controls.
“ A logical counter explanation, to your point, would be that geographic locations sponsoring the opening of a Starbucks may also be making a general investment in local businesses, and as a result we see startup density in general increase.”
Yes, and you also need to explore whether rejected Starbucks openings are really random and whether those neighborhoods are in fact good controls.
“ A logical counter explanation, to your point, would be that geographic locations sponsoring the opening of a Starbucks may also be making a general investment in local businesses, and as a result we see startup density in general increase.”
Yes, and you also need to explore whether rejected Starbucks openings are really random and whether those neighborhoods are in fact good controls.